zenicurean ([info]zenicurean) wrote,
@ 2009-05-20 01:14:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current music:Iron Maiden - The Wicker Man

The Chipping Bloc.
Now, if you've read this bit of news and/or rumour, you'll note it lists "domestic help" among the candidates for a new, more chipper existence. Yes. Domestic help. Now think about it. This raises a variety of questions. The first and foremost is, will there be a separate consumer interface for the Global Poisoning Satelite, or will the Kill The Pool Boy option be programmed to an integrated home remote?

I mean, it'd be awkward, particularly since your average flat will be pretty computerised in a few years. What does this button do? Click. That's the kitchen sub-menu. What does this button do? Click. That controls the air conditioning. Oh, and what's this button? Click. Well, shit, it turns out that activates the giant orbital death satelite and offs Ivan. Sorry, Ivan, I thought that was the ceiling fan. Guess those Piña Coladas ain't forthcoming, ha ha, eh, Ivan?

See the problem? I mean, you need product design for these things. You don't want to be in a situation where you want to turn on the home entertainment system, but instead end up with a gardener spasming on the porch and foaming at the mouth. That sort of thing upsets people. If the Saudis ever start marketting this thing, there'll be so many customers carrying a chip on their shoulder, let me tell you.



(21 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]matrexius
2009-05-19 11:21 pm UTC (link)
The real question here is: who chips the chipmakers?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]zenicurean
2009-05-19 11:54 pm UTC (link)
If they're clever little chipmakers, I presume the plan would have to be "nobody". (Or that's more or less what I would be angling for if I was manufacturing these unbelievable Cyberpunk clichés, at least.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]terva
2009-05-20 12:35 am UTC (link)
My concern is, that wherever in modern world this dude or dudette with the chip would be walking, his/her deathchip activates on definite signal. Some of the millions gadgets s/he just happened to walk nearby from might be on the right frequency to cause unintentional poisoning.

Tracking chip idea would be a little more acceptable, but I don't know.

I've somehow figured out already that in some point people will carry their identification inside them, instead of in papers and cards. Why not trackers too, so we could have full Big Brother experience.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]zenicurean
2009-05-20 12:42 am UTC (link)
Some of the millions gadgets s/he just happened to walk nearby from might be on the right frequency to cause unintentional poisoning.

This here is a golden idea. Absolutely golden. "Hey, it's Dissident Billy! Dissident Billy, could you buy this old Roomba off my hands? You can turn it on remotely, like th... Billy? Come on, Billy, the Roomba isn't that bad." (I'm actually looking forward to the first subdermal ID/medical/credit card chips, if for no other reason, then because I want to see how many crazies will publically go on a tangent about the Book of Revelation.)

Edited at 2009-05-20 12:43 am UTC

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]terva
2009-05-20 12:06 pm UTC (link)
Well, probably the chip would activate only from a very definite and complicate code. But if it doesn't have some kind of transmitter, the code wouldn't be as safe as when it should answer back to verify activating the poison. I'm not really into this kind of nonsense. What on earth would it even help to be able to kill a person from distance by pushing a button? At least it really doesn't fit to western sense of law and justice.

However, I'm also hoping I live long enough to get one of those chips, and see how all sorts of crazies absolutely refuse to have them and start preparing for the rapture.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]harper_knight
2009-05-20 02:44 am UTC (link)
If I don't get a giant orbital death satellite hooked up to my home mainframe, I shall be very disappointed.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]matrexius
2009-05-20 05:21 am UTC (link)
Same, but on the other hand, do we really want these things to be available to the public?

(insert "No, you can't have a giant orbital death satellite/NOT YOURS" macro)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hellmutt
2009-05-20 12:18 pm UTC (link)
Pah, it's no match for my bukkit. Wake me up when we get to the

Amphibious Attack Tigers

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]matrexius
2009-05-20 12:46 pm UTC (link)
*casually activates high-voltage power source as attack tigers swim through the moat around his castle*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hellmutt
2009-05-20 12:56 pm UTC (link)
...Their rubber wetsuits protect them?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]matrexius
2009-05-20 03:20 pm UTC (link)
Silly. You assume that was to electrify the water. In reality, the high-voltage power source activated my army of Robotic Richard Simmons(es).

Your tigers are helpless.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hellmutt
2009-05-20 03:30 pm UTC (link)
What is a Richard Sim*googles* OH DEAR DOG THAT IS UNHOLY.

Evans, sic 'em.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]petronivs
2009-05-20 02:09 pm UTC (link)
You know, living, breathing pool boys have a usefulness which mechanical robots will never quite match.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hellmutt
2009-05-20 03:27 pm UTC (link)
Er, what? Bone marrow?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]petronivs
2009-05-20 03:28 pm UTC (link)
They also keep the housewives occupied.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hellmutt
2009-05-20 03:33 pm UTC (link)
So can machines.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]petronivs
2009-05-20 03:39 pm UTC (link)
True, but I don't think technology is really yet near the point where it can successfully duplicate the ineffable sensation of having the head of an eager to please young man between your legs, enthusiastically doing those things which enthusiastic young men do to please.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hellmutt
2009-05-20 03:42 pm UTC (link)
Said young man sounds quite effable to me, in a theoretical sense at least.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]zenicurean
2009-05-21 12:06 am UTC (link)
Nobody gets to eff anyone around here until I get a camera crew together.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hellmutt
2009-05-21 10:23 am UTC (link)
It beats me how this conversation even came around; I thought we were talking about playing chess.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]Daniel [oeconomist.com]
2009-05-26 05:07 am UTC (link)
Sale could be banned even while granting the patent.

If the thing is banned, having it also patented increases the charges that might be brought against those selling the things. After all, there's more conspiracy if they paid the licensing fees, and infringement if they did not.

If the thing is not banned, then the effects of denying a patent are more ambiguous. On the one hand, one could sell the things without paying licensing fees. On the other hand, potential for monopoly rents is decreased.

(Reply to this)


(21 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…